Jump to Navigation

Me on Twitter

  • @ak_anneka Je découvre ton travail : c'est génial et ça donne envie d'en avoir un chez soi ! 6 years 12 weeks ago
  • RT @ak_anneka: Je l'ai terminé ! I did it, I did it, yeah! #art #ink #artist #bird #tiny #objects #doodle #fun #color #red #yellow #ooak ht… 6 years 12 weeks ago
  • RT @Devoxx: 6 years 14 weeks ago
  • RT @esa: Our week in #space images, featuring an Earth view taken by @Astro_Alex on the Space Station, the #Aeolus satellite's Vega rocket… 6 years 15 weeks ago
  • Wow.... Huge reservoir of liquid water detected under the surface of Mars https://t.co/PsJpjY7uFC via @AAAS @EurekAlert 6 years 18 weeks ago
  • RT @ChromiumDev: 6 years 18 weeks ago
  • RT @rupl: 6 years 19 weeks ago
  • Sorry @instapaper I can't wait any longer for you to be back online for Europeans. I'm back to @Pocket 6 years 24 weeks ago
  • Today it's #aiparis. Let's See that... 6 years 24 weeks ago
  • RT @MKBHD: Confirmed: You learn WAY more outside your comfort zone than in it. 6 years 26 weeks ago

Reply to comment

python Python versus Shell scripting : from experience

A quick "pros & cons" to choose between Python or Shell scripting, from what I've observed through the years.

This could probably apply to other high level script languages* vs shell.

* Like Ruby, but not like Perl, as it shares more with shells from my point of view, like unreadable syntax and execution speed.

Python vs Shell

Choose Python for :

  • its simple syntax : can be read even by non Python-speaking people. End users may not be scared to change scripts to fit their need.
  • portability : Python is actually more portable than shell because of ease of installation for any OS. Shell is theoretically portable but it's complicated to explain end users how to install the runtime (e.g. see cygwin). A Python script can be packaged into an executable program. There may be ways to bundle a script with the shell runtime.

Choose Shell for :

  • speed : except in case of bad code logic, shell scripts are usually a lot faster than Python's equivalents.
  • its ease to deal with external programs and system : shell's syntax is already made to test/pipe/chain easily existing programs, whereas Python requires some extra boilerplate. Shell also has built-in functions to deal directly with files and the system, whereas Python uses an object-oriented model, which may not be as handy.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Vous pouvez activer la coloration syntaxique du code source à l'aide des balises suivantes: <code>, <blockcode>, <drupal5>, <drupal6>, <java>, <javascript>, <php>, <python>. The supported tag styles are: <foo>, [foo].
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.